Opposition Parties Lambast Migrant Quota Referendum

  • 4 May 2016 9:00 AM
Opposition Parties Lambast Migrant Quota Referendum
Hungary’s opposition parties slammed the government’s planned referendum on the European Union’s proposed mandatory migrant quota scheme after the supreme court approved the vote in a binding decision. The Kúria rejected appeals submitted against the National Election Committee’s decision to pass the referendum question.

The radical nationalist Jobbik party said parliament should reject mandatory migrant quotas by amending the constitution instead of holding a referendum.

Lawmaker Dániel Z Kárpát said rejecting migrant quotas in the constitution would cost far less than holding a referendum, adding that Jobbik would provide the votes needed to ensure a two-thirds majority in parliament for the amendment.

DK called the referendum “anti- European” and said it was not actually about taking in refugees but rather about terminating Hungary’s European Union membership.

Zsolt Gréczy, the party’s spokesman, said that the “deceptive” referendum aims to convince voters that there is “such a thing as a free lunch” and that Hungary can be a “freeloader” in the EU if it wants to be.

Gréczy insisted that this was not an option. Együtt said the Kúria’s decision to approve the referendum was unlawful. Party leader Viktor Szigetvári said that the court’s ruling was “shameful”. He said the prime minister was committing “a historic crime”, insisting that Orbán actually wanted to use the vote as a referendum against Europe.

Szigetvári accused Orbán of doing the bidding of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Dialogue for Hungary Party said it acknowledged the Kúria’s decision but insisted that contrary to the top court’s assessment, the referendum concerns Hungary’s international obligations.

MEP Benedek Jávor said the Kúria’s interpretation of international commitments was too narrow, arguing that regulating migration was a split competency of both EU bodies and member states. Jávor also argued that the term “resettlement” was not a legal one, meaning that the referendum question’s phrasing was also unclear.

The Liberal Party said it would turn to the Constitutional Court over the Kúria’s decision. The liberals called on the court to protect the institution of the referendum and not to allow a referendum to be held that would only serve the political interests of ruling Fidesz.

Source www.hungarymatters.hu - Visit Hungary Matters to sign-up for MTI’s twice-daily newsletter.

MTI photo: Krizsán Csaba

  • How does this content make you feel?